Bad Fashion

Reader Comments

• 16. IS THAT CINDY LOU WHO IN PHOTO #6?

  Posted at 12:30PM on 27th 2008 by JODI

• 17. DYNOMITE!

  Posted at 12:29PM on 27th 2008 by dave m.

• 18. I think that #1,6,10,14,16 and 17 are hot even with clothes like that

  Posted at 12:02PM on 27th 2008 by the guy with tast

• 19. WELCOME TO THE CIRCUS!

  Posted at 11:41AM on 27th 2008 by 12398wjefiqwjtjqi3ot4

• 20. hot!

  Posted at 11:36AM on 27th 2008 by kennt

• 21. From the comments, someone here has never taken acid. These would decidedly be considered products of a VERY BAD trip. Like a Belladonna trip.

  Posted at 9:52AM on 27th 2008 by Cyd

• 22. They are all hideous with the exception of #5, which is cool looking, though not something most people would wear, and #18 which is, let's face it, just a full kilt, and kilts are just plain cool.

  Posted at 9:38AM on 27th 2008 by Cyd

• 23. I'll give some of them art, but at least one is just a union suit, and one is a sweatshirt with tassles glued to the chest...

  Posted at 9:30AM on 27th 2008 by Brad

• 24. Couture is meant to be art in the form of clothing - it's isn't necessarily intended to be worn on the street. Study these pieces the way you would study a painting and you'll be amazed at what you see.

  Posted at 9:21AM on 27th 2008 by Megan

• 25. Don't use "bad", it's too vague; even more when speaking about something as relative and abstract as high-couture. Nice effort though.

  Posted at 9:16AM on 27th 2008 by Donald

• 26. Pffft.
The nerve of them to even call this art.
Anything abstract is the work of a lazy person who has the nerve to call him/herself a designer or an artist.
Trash like these shouldn't be patronized
And also the silly so-called art community who call themselves critics and don't really know anything about aesthetics should be banished for clapping joyously and praising the first ugly colorful thing they see.

Seriously, this is worse than cooked human fetuses.

  Posted at 9:01AM on 27th 2008 by Royskopp

• 27. I would wear dress number 13#. A lot of people here don't understand that most of these items are not meant to be worn they are to be admired; crazy and thought provoking. It doesn't have to be 'nice' to be appreciated. These designers are not crazy they are creative - and you don't need to 'know' the designer to consider what they are trying to achieve.

  Posted at 8:50AM on 27th 2008 by Claire

• 28. Only answer imaginable: Someone punked the models.

  Posted at 8:46AM on 27th 2008 by Rus

• 29. I can crap out better outfits than these. They are not art or haute, they are silly rags being pawned off as "fashion."

  Posted at 8:26AM on 27th 2008 by Francois

• 30. For a second there, I thought I was looking at a cross between The Predator and Whoopi Goldberg....damn...

  Posted at 2:52AM on 27th 2008 by MC