1. We found this site by mistake - and we WON'T make that accident again. WHO CARES what "stars" wear? What does it matter? They waste thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars on a dress or an outfit or shoes or a purse, all of which could pay for medications to save the lives of ten people right here in our country who can't afford their prescriptions (and no, fortunately, we're not on that list - at least, not yet), and HUNDREDS of people in Africa. This site is so ridiculously shallow it's embarrassing that it was written in the USA.
GET A LIFE!
3. Who ever is writing the commentaries to these pictures is a genious. The title of this whole thing is "bad sag fashion", and it is bad. But the comments paint such an utterly hysterical portrait to our pop culture fascinations that I way crying with laughter. It's refreshing and witty.
Thanks again to the commentator. You rock!
4. Your whole "feature" on "Bad SAG Fashion '08" is IGNORANT.
It is just like this: you don't realize that what is appealing to one person might not be appealing to another. Different people have different tastes.
I found almost all of the people pictured to be attractive people wearing attractive clothing.
Your "snappy" remarks about them were tasteless, too.
For people as bad as your writers, all I can think of is that poor upbringing by their parents is their only excuse.
DAW
5. Yeah, well you know what, Carol??? Not everyone wants to have leathery skin by the time their 50. Nor do I think that orange is sexy. I think Cate Blanchett's paleness is sexy, because it makes her stand out.
7. If I had to pick one, Sandra's could be the most decent one. But Cate B. OMG! What was she thinking? Perhaps a trip to the tanning bed could have helped?............Na...
10. It would be nice if TMZ would occasionally just show the photos and let US decide if we like the dresses or not. For example, how about showing all the dresses you think are questionable and we vote on each one. Then you put up the article.
Here is a nice set of photos of ALL the dresses:
http://www.style.com/peopleparties/parties/thumb/012808SAGA/new
Look at that! And they don't even tell you what you are supposed to think about the outfits. They just let the reader decide. This is almost like real journalism. You might try it sometime TMX!
Sometimes I think everyone on your staff is around 19 years old! I'm just sayin'!
13. I think Debbie is amazing and her body is killer. She interviews people so much better than Giuliana. Plus Giuliana is so UGLY. She looks like she has horse teeth and she thinks she is so cute! Lay off Debbie!
14. Its true that some of the dresses were the worst but in general they were ok and the gals did look pretty...I did not enjoy Debbie the interviewer..she was the worst with no tact..in everyones face and vulgar...I did enjoy Mrs. Rancic the other interviewer she was pleasant and sweet....Debbie get out of the business !!!!!!
15. Darla- "But look how beautiful Rebecca Romijn looks aside from the dress . . . . . . . what I nice looking gal!!!!!"
-Okay, but the topic is FASHION.
Not, who looks better in a trashbag-like dress.
Reader Comments
1. We found this site by mistake - and we WON'T make that accident again. WHO CARES what "stars" wear? What does it matter? They waste thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars on a dress or an outfit or shoes or a purse, all of which could pay for medications to save the lives of ten people right here in our country who can't afford their prescriptions (and no, fortunately, we're not on that list - at least, not yet), and HUNDREDS of people in Africa. This site is so ridiculously shallow it's embarrassing that it was written in the USA. GET A LIFE!
Posted at 11:35PM on 18th 2008 by LadyFenix
2. leave them alone they bring joy to our lives
Posted at 9:11AM on 7th 2008 by 3world creature
3. Who ever is writing the commentaries to these pictures is a genious. The title of this whole thing is "bad sag fashion", and it is bad. But the comments paint such an utterly hysterical portrait to our pop culture fascinations that I way crying with laughter. It's refreshing and witty. Thanks again to the commentator. You rock!
Posted at 1:43AM on 7th 2008 by Jennifer
4. Your whole "feature" on "Bad SAG Fashion '08" is IGNORANT. It is just like this: you don't realize that what is appealing to one person might not be appealing to another. Different people have different tastes. I found almost all of the people pictured to be attractive people wearing attractive clothing. Your "snappy" remarks about them were tasteless, too. For people as bad as your writers, all I can think of is that poor upbringing by their parents is their only excuse. DAW
Posted at 5:43PM on 6th 2008 by DAW
5. Yeah, well you know what, Carol??? Not everyone wants to have leathery skin by the time their 50. Nor do I think that orange is sexy. I think Cate Blanchett's paleness is sexy, because it makes her stand out.
Posted at 4:39PM on 2nd 2008 by Meg
6. Jane, about to serve cocktails at a backyard bar-b-q. Stirred, not shaken, in a gumball machine.
Posted at 1:46PM on 1st 2008 by Handi Baby
7. If I had to pick one, Sandra's could be the most decent one. But Cate B. OMG! What was she thinking? Perhaps a trip to the tanning bed could have helped?............Na...
Posted at 4:36PM on 31st 2008 by Carol
8. 1974 avocado appliance - I peed myself laughing - EVERY ONE OF THE COMMENTS WERE RIGHT ON
Posted at 3:05AM on 30th 2008 by Bud Hofermanshilt
9. Debra Messing, Cate Blanchett? Seriously, TMZ has NO TASTE of Fashion AT All!!!! Fire the person who critic this....
Posted at 10:01PM on 29th 2008 by jimmy
10. It would be nice if TMZ would occasionally just show the photos and let US decide if we like the dresses or not. For example, how about showing all the dresses you think are questionable and we vote on each one. Then you put up the article. Here is a nice set of photos of ALL the dresses: http://www.style.com/peopleparties/parties/thumb/012808SAGA/new Look at that! And they don't even tell you what you are supposed to think about the outfits. They just let the reader decide. This is almost like real journalism. You might try it sometime TMX! Sometimes I think everyone on your staff is around 19 years old! I'm just sayin'!
Posted at 7:01PM on 29th 2008 by Surferess
11. Sandra Oh's dress was an homage to a traditional Korean dress called a Hanbok. Maybe do an ounce of research before shooting your mouths off.
Posted at 3:56PM on 29th 2008 by amazon
12. where was joan rivers when we needed her?
Posted at 1:00AM on 29th 2008 by kj
13. I think Debbie is amazing and her body is killer. She interviews people so much better than Giuliana. Plus Giuliana is so UGLY. She looks like she has horse teeth and she thinks she is so cute! Lay off Debbie!
Posted at 6:10PM on 28th 2008 by Ashleigh
14. Its true that some of the dresses were the worst but in general they were ok and the gals did look pretty...I did not enjoy Debbie the interviewer..she was the worst with no tact..in everyones face and vulgar...I did enjoy Mrs. Rancic the other interviewer she was pleasant and sweet....Debbie get out of the business !!!!!!
Posted at 5:32PM on 28th 2008 by ida
15. Darla- "But look how beautiful Rebecca Romijn looks aside from the dress . . . . . . . what I nice looking gal!!!!!" -Okay, but the topic is FASHION. Not, who looks better in a trashbag-like dress.
Posted at 5:15PM on 28th 2008 by Michelle