Britney Spears Topless

Reader Comments

• 76. nice boobys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  Posted at 7:50PM on 8th 2009 by LEO WEISMAN

• 77. Remov Stars NOW!

  Posted at 7:44PM on 8th 2009 by A

• 78. Why is it okay for actresses to do topless movie rolls but not okay for topless photos of Britney to appear online? She's a grown woman, and if she's comfortable with her (totally amazing!) body then why can't the rest of us be?? And for those criticizing her "drooping breasts", wasn't she breastfeeding in 2007? I think she looks pretty darn incredible!

  Posted at 7:26PM on 8th 2009 by AM

• 79. WHO CARES? Like thos ephotos are THAT BAD. Doesn't anyone have anything better to talk about? The people complaining are probably just fat and ugly and jealous. At least she will have pics to look back at @ 80 years old and remember how beautiful she was. These aren't anything to cause an uproar about. WHO...CARES

  Posted at 6:33PM on 8th 2009 by Cara

• 80. she looks alright. I must say though, as a 42 yr old my nips are higher than hers. she seems a bit low to the ground for her young age.

  Posted at 6:32PM on 8th 2009 by laura c

• 81. *** her right, your left ***

  Posted at 5:43PM on 8th 2009 by sally

• 82. and judging by her left one (your right looking at the photo) they look like tats to me, definetly doesnt look like a stick on...

  Posted at 5:42PM on 8th 2009 by sally

• 83. haha it looks like they forgot to cover up her other nipple with a little star...

  Posted at 5:40PM on 8th 2009 by sally

• 84. THOSE AREN'T TATTOOS YOU IDIOTS!! They are like "pasties" -- similar to when Janet Jackson had her infamous Super Bowl moment. God, you people are so stupid!!!

  Posted at 5:38PM on 8th 2009 by UGH

• 85. Hmmmmn...didn't know she had that many tats

  Posted at 5:11PM on 8th 2009 by COCO

• 86. She chose not to release these for a reason. I personally think she is skanky,(for other reasons) but to label her as such for pics that other people throw out there against her wishes, is unfair. Having said that, Im surprised she hasnt done a porno yet. She has been rumored to hang around with porn stars and has no problem showing her cooch in public. I think the best thing we ALL can do is just plain ignore her. Dont give her anymore money (albums, concerts or otherwise)and let her go earn a honest living. BSing people into thinking youre an "artist" and creating controversy to sell CDs b/c your talent (or lack thereof) isnt enough, is not an honest living. Common sense is out the window nowadays.

  Posted at 5:04PM on 8th 2009 by Shadow

• 87. Gross, all of a sudden these come out when nobody gives a damn about her anymore, she is just really gross

  Posted at 5:02PM on 8th 2009 by Chrissy Estabrook

• 88. Who cares!

  Posted at 4:24PM on 8th 2009 by cocoa8141

• 89. A tat for tit?

  Posted at 4:05PM on 8th 2009 by Steve in Boston

• 90. Damn, she is one ugly white-trash skank. Perfect "American" idol.

  Posted at 3:42PM on 8th 2009 by Reality Check