61. So if nobody had dug that deep, it's okay that she signed her name to a lie?
And then lied several times afterward, still saying there were no more pictures and more kept showing up. Then she tried to say the wind blew her shirt open. I guess it blew her shirt open several times because there is more than one picture. Look, I agree with her stance, I don't think that question should have ever been asked anyway, but it was. Then she tried to cover up by lying over and over again after getting caught because she knew she had lied on the entry contract. Mistakes happen, but take your medicine.
She should have resigned as soon as the first photos appeared. You can't just keep fouling up over and over on the same issue and say it's alright because you're a Christian. Even when a Christian asks for forgiveness, they are supposed to at least make an attempt to not do the same thing again.
62. If you dig deep on every human being you will find fault in something they did. All of us fall short!! Had she not taken the stance, nobody would have dug that deep. Fact is she fell under attack from satan. He has something on all of us...but thankfully the price was already paid...
63. And had she not lied, she would never have been able to compete in the first place. Nobody's talking about being perfect, she lied on a signed contract to get in the original competition. That's not taking a stand for Jesus.
You can't have it both ways. It's wrong to chastise her for her comments, but it's okay that she lied on a signed contract to get there in the first place? Good grief!
65. Well nobody ever said any Christian is perfect. The point is when you take a stand for Jesus the world will attack you. Satan is the great accuser. Had she not took a stance on the question, she would still be Miss California and Miss USA.
66. Standing up for Jesus Christ?
She lied!! First she signed and agreement for the original contest saying that she had never posed, which if she had told the truth she would have never been allowed to compete in the first place. Next, she lied on several occasions after the first pictures surfaced and said there were no more. It has nothing to do with her stance or comments at the pageant.
She's a liar, and signed her name to a lie on the original contract.
Sounds like a good Christian to me.
Geeeeeez!!
69. For the beginning of this comment read below...
But after listening to the conversation between Billy Bush and Carrie, it leads me to believe that there is a ton of miss communication going on. Carrie didn't even know she was fired, plus from her understanding thing were going fine. I think that there is a lot of missing pieces to this puzzle that no one will be able to put together unless you talk with the horse's mouth... and that means talking to both sides.
70. Actually, I just found one answer to my question. The following was published through Fox News online...
"After finishing as runner-up at the Miss USA pageant, Prejean then made a number of appearances unauthorized by the state pageant team, says the source, thus violating her contract, which states: “I shall not consent to any publicity without the prior written approval from Miss Universe or, until the succeeding year’s state pageant in the State, you.”
So, the issue is that she supposedly didn't get permission to be involved in unauthorized appearances. This is why she was fired.
-----> read the comment below to finish this comment
72. You know what I am curious about? She was fired for a breach of contract for not going to appearances. What appearances did she not show at. What kind of appearances were they. Is it possible that the appearances that she was required to go to were against what she believes in? If she choose not to do these appearances that is her choice... and if I was her I probably would have given up my crown for the principle of the matter. Again... these are just some thoughts and questions that I cannot seem to find answers to.
Has anyone found out what kind of appearances she supposedly did not show up to?
Also... maybe she has been cooperating and has gone to all the required appearances. But in addition to these appearances, she has also involved herself in groups that do not support same sex marriage. If this has been happening, would her involvement in these groups be considered a breach of contract?
Just my thoughts and questions?
74. WOW! I think a LOT of you are missing the point! This is about a BREACH OF CONTRACT!!! Stop trying to hash up old news - she was entitled to her own opinion, whether any of you agree or not. I don't agree with her opinion, but that's neither here nor there when it comes to this post. This is about her being such a spoiled brat that thinks she can go and do whatever she wants - damn the contract. My deduction is that she got an inflated ego when Trump came to her defense and thought that she was above the contract. I guess she learned the hard way that you have to do the job you are awarded. She fought for that position. How dare she take it for granted when there are plenty of other women who would actually fulfill their contract!!
75. And why does anyone care?
I darn sure don't.
People are so wrapped up in others' lives they fail to care about, and see, the real problems of the world.
Reader Comments
61. So if nobody had dug that deep, it's okay that she signed her name to a lie? And then lied several times afterward, still saying there were no more pictures and more kept showing up. Then she tried to say the wind blew her shirt open. I guess it blew her shirt open several times because there is more than one picture. Look, I agree with her stance, I don't think that question should have ever been asked anyway, but it was. Then she tried to cover up by lying over and over again after getting caught because she knew she had lied on the entry contract. Mistakes happen, but take your medicine. She should have resigned as soon as the first photos appeared. You can't just keep fouling up over and over on the same issue and say it's alright because you're a Christian. Even when a Christian asks for forgiveness, they are supposed to at least make an attempt to not do the same thing again.
Posted at 11:04PM on 10th 2009 by cb
62. If you dig deep on every human being you will find fault in something they did. All of us fall short!! Had she not taken the stance, nobody would have dug that deep. Fact is she fell under attack from satan. He has something on all of us...but thankfully the price was already paid...
Posted at 10:41PM on 10th 2009 by Joe
63. And had she not lied, she would never have been able to compete in the first place. Nobody's talking about being perfect, she lied on a signed contract to get in the original competition. That's not taking a stand for Jesus. You can't have it both ways. It's wrong to chastise her for her comments, but it's okay that she lied on a signed contract to get there in the first place? Good grief!
Posted at 10:33PM on 10th 2009 by cb
64. I AM GAY and I AM GLAD THAT THAT BITCH GOT FIRED
Posted at 10:11PM on 10th 2009 by Elton John
65. Well nobody ever said any Christian is perfect. The point is when you take a stand for Jesus the world will attack you. Satan is the great accuser. Had she not took a stance on the question, she would still be Miss California and Miss USA.
Posted at 10:10PM on 10th 2009 by Joe
66. Standing up for Jesus Christ? She lied!! First she signed and agreement for the original contest saying that she had never posed, which if she had told the truth she would have never been allowed to compete in the first place. Next, she lied on several occasions after the first pictures surfaced and said there were no more. It has nothing to do with her stance or comments at the pageant. She's a liar, and signed her name to a lie on the original contract. Sounds like a good Christian to me. Geeeeeez!!
Posted at 9:40PM on 10th 2009 by cb
67. Joe, you've got that right!! Carrie did the RIGHT thing, by standing up for Jesus Christ. What ever happened to freedom of speech in this country?
Posted at 8:52PM on 10th 2009 by Dont Believe in a Lie
68. Proves when you take a stand for Jesus the world will reject you
Posted at 7:15PM on 10th 2009 by Joe
69. For the beginning of this comment read below... But after listening to the conversation between Billy Bush and Carrie, it leads me to believe that there is a ton of miss communication going on. Carrie didn't even know she was fired, plus from her understanding thing were going fine. I think that there is a lot of missing pieces to this puzzle that no one will be able to put together unless you talk with the horse's mouth... and that means talking to both sides.
Posted at 5:51PM on 10th 2009 by Julia
70. Actually, I just found one answer to my question. The following was published through Fox News online... "After finishing as runner-up at the Miss USA pageant, Prejean then made a number of appearances unauthorized by the state pageant team, says the source, thus violating her contract, which states: “I shall not consent to any publicity without the prior written approval from Miss Universe or, until the succeeding year’s state pageant in the State, you.” So, the issue is that she supposedly didn't get permission to be involved in unauthorized appearances. This is why she was fired. -----> read the comment below to finish this comment
Posted at 5:50PM on 10th 2009 by Julia
71. looks like another sleazy blonde from the christian right will be headed to the fox news network.
Posted at 5:50PM on 10th 2009 by eugene smith
72. You know what I am curious about? She was fired for a breach of contract for not going to appearances. What appearances did she not show at. What kind of appearances were they. Is it possible that the appearances that she was required to go to were against what she believes in? If she choose not to do these appearances that is her choice... and if I was her I probably would have given up my crown for the principle of the matter. Again... these are just some thoughts and questions that I cannot seem to find answers to. Has anyone found out what kind of appearances she supposedly did not show up to? Also... maybe she has been cooperating and has gone to all the required appearances. But in addition to these appearances, she has also involved herself in groups that do not support same sex marriage. If this has been happening, would her involvement in these groups be considered a breach of contract? Just my thoughts and questions?
Posted at 5:39PM on 10th 2009 by Juia
73. Why do they let fags judge contest? I guess the females would feel save from being hit on.
Posted at 5:06PM on 10th 2009 by Joe
74. WOW! I think a LOT of you are missing the point! This is about a BREACH OF CONTRACT!!! Stop trying to hash up old news - she was entitled to her own opinion, whether any of you agree or not. I don't agree with her opinion, but that's neither here nor there when it comes to this post. This is about her being such a spoiled brat that thinks she can go and do whatever she wants - damn the contract. My deduction is that she got an inflated ego when Trump came to her defense and thought that she was above the contract. I guess she learned the hard way that you have to do the job you are awarded. She fought for that position. How dare she take it for granted when there are plenty of other women who would actually fulfill their contract!!
Posted at 4:19PM on 10th 2009 by Jodi
75. And why does anyone care? I darn sure don't. People are so wrapped up in others' lives they fail to care about, and see, the real problems of the world.
Posted at 4:14PM on 10th 2009 by NavajoNPaleFace