Celeb Tattoos

Reader Comments

• 46. P.S--- MY BF HAS TATS AND THERE IS NOT ONE DOG AFRAID OF HIM AT AN ANIMAL SHELTER. so thats not true. there not afraid of the tats, they are afraid of the person who has them. animals can sense wat kind of person they are...so its not the tats retard

  Posted at 9:00PM on 23rd 2008 by jen

• 47. tattoos can be very tasteful and beautiful work of art. everyone is entitled to ur own opinions, so stop trashing the ppl that love tats. i have 2 tats, and plan on getting more. im not doin it for STREET CRED...i get tattoos that mean somethin to me. MY TATTOOS ARE FOR ME AND NO ONE ELSE. if u dont like it, too bad. dont look at it. ppl that rush into tats and get them cuz they think they are cool are dumb, cuz then they get somethin that means nothin to them and it stupid. a person who relli thought about wat they wanted, and relli loves their ink...they know wat i mean. TATS ARE FOR THE PERSON WHO HAS THEM, NOT FOR ANYONE ELSE. dont trash tats, cuz u cant knock it until u try it.

  Posted at 8:57PM on 23rd 2008 by jen

• 48. With exception to indigenous cultures that accept tattooing as a sociocultural norm (ie Maori natives in New Zealand), showy tattoos is garish and often repulsive. Sure, it helps up the street cred, but here's the fact: dogs at the animal shelters are genuinely afraid of men with tattoos on face, neck, arms and hands. What does this tell you? Tattooed = obnoxious, abusive and mean-spirited. It's funny that some of the people who chose to have tattoos like young women opt for "tramp stamp" on the leg/ankle, neck and lower back will end up having to shelling out $$$ for laser removal some years later, because they realize that as they get older, their saggy lower back and neck showing wrinkled tattoo are disgusting sight that would be publicly humiliating. Why American people chose to get several tattoos on their bodies is beyond my comprehension, and it has to do with showing off in being rad and hip. LMAO, egomaniacs.

  Posted at 8:44PM on 23rd 2008 by Tattoos suck

• 49. Hey "douchebag", tasteful tattoos are beautiful, people dont just get tattoos because everyone in Hollywood has them. Tattoos have been around long before Hollywood was here, so get your history straight before you start mouthing off chick....so go get you one and then maybe youll b happy with your life and leave tattooed people alone! Besides, what can b so wrong of a tattoo of a cross, dont you love the lord? Ill pray for you babe, xoxo

  Posted at 6:31PM on 23rd 2008 by Darcie

• 50. those will look AWSOME when they get really old !

  Posted at 6:28PM on 23rd 2008 by jackie

• 51. ...which is IN the french riviera..juust sayin'

  Posted at 5:52PM on 23rd 2008 by you

• 52. Monte Carlo is in Monaco, not France. Just sayin...

  Posted at 5:40PM on 23rd 2008 by Me

• 53. My god Eve has some fugly tits. Are those paw tattoos forcing them apart? LOL YUCK!

  Posted at 5:03PM on 23rd 2008 by Jennifer

• 54. Please. Every douchebag in Hollywood thinks he can buy himself some instant street cred by getting an armful of tattoos. You can't be a cool rebel by doing something every other wannabe on the planet is doing. And tattoos are ugly and cheap looking, not attractive.

  Posted at 5:03PM on 23rd 2008 by Cynic

• 55. Nothing says "douchebag" quite like a bunch of tattoos. That trend is so over. Every has-been and wanna-be in Hollywood thinks they can get themselves some instant street cred by getting an armful of tattoos. When everybody's doing it, it's not cool or rebellious any more. Not that it ever was. Dumbasses.

  Posted at 5:01PM on 23rd 2008 by Cynic

• 56. Yes....Yucky!

  Posted at 4:57PM on 23rd 2008 by Mia

• 57. tattoos are amazing, they each tell a story (unless your an idiot and get something completely dumb)but making the right decision on one and showing it off is awsome

  Posted at 3:24AM on 20th 2007 by marco