Chest Bumpin' Bush

Reader Comments

• 31. i'm a republican but i'm voting for obama. bush has really screwed up the economy with his iraq war.

  Posted at 9:09PM on 29th 2008 by mike

• 32. What argument? I have not seen one from the Global Hoax side yet.

  Posted at 9:05PM on 29th 2008 by Mark

• 33. mc cain more like mc can't, mc can't lead our country.

  Posted at 9:05PM on 29th 2008 by dan

• 34. i don't want a 100 year war. i'm not voting for mc cain.

  Posted at 9:03PM on 29th 2008 by amy

• 35. mccain is too old.

  Posted at 9:02PM on 29th 2008 by dan

• 36. you are right. you can't deny the large shelf of ice breaking off in antarctica. in a world of billions of people you can find a few wing nut scientits who disagree about global warming.global warming is real and mark should realize he has lost the arguement and move on . new subject Is Bush and MCcain different or the same?

  Posted at 8:59PM on 29th 2008 by carly

• 37. Steve is a bark humping idiot. The study was done with the same criteria used in the original concensus report sited by all the man caused global warming hucksters. Your right data does not lie but it seems some people are to stupid to understand it.

  Posted at 8:57PM on 29th 2008 by Mark

• 38. YEAH, MARK QOUTES A MEDICAL RESEARCHER NOT A CLIMATALOGISTS. GO FIGURE.

  Posted at 8:51PM on 29th 2008 by KELLY

• 39. THIS MARK DUDE IS A REPUBLICAN DWEEB. LET'S KEEP IT IN PERSPECTIVE. YOU READ REPORTS PREPARED BY THE OIL COMPANIES AND CALL IT SCIENCE. DATA DOESN'T LIE. PEOPLE DIED AT THE DOME AND BUSH IS PARTLY TO BLAME. IRAQ WAS DESIGNED TO ALLOW U.S. OIL COMPANIES TO GO INTO IRAQ. ONLY 2% OF THE CONFLICTS IN IRAQ INVOLVE AL QAIDA, BUT WE ARE THEY TO FIGHT THE TERRORISTS CUZ THERE ARE NO WMDS.AFGHANISTAN WHERE POPPIES GROW LIKE AMBER WAVES AND AL QAIDA HAS REGROUPED AND SURGING DUE TO DIVERSION OF US FORCES TO IRAQ.

  Posted at 8:48PM on 29th 2008 by STEVE

• 40. Nasa corrected there error siting 1998 as the hottest year on record. The peer reviewed reports sited by many have been debunked as well. Since many of the studies found in Naomi Oreskes' survey are now nearly 15 years old a new survey was done using the same techniques. By examining peer-reviewed papers published on the ISI Web of Science database medical researcher Dr. Klaus-Martin Schulte repeated Oreskes' study. The new study found 528 papers that matched the search results for the period 2004 through February 2007. Of those only 7% gave an explicit endorsement of the “consensus view”. Extending the scope to those that gave either an explicit or implicit endorsement the study found 45% in support of the “consensus view”. Even more striking is that a majority (54%) now either reject the “consensus view” outright or are now neutral regarding anthropogenic climate change. You can read more regarding this new study at DailyTech.com.

  Posted at 8:46PM on 29th 2008 by Mark

• 41. dear mark it's so funny that in your comments try to call me a racist just cause i'm support obama who you call a racist also.it'is so funny cause i been in iraq 3 times figthing for people that i even know.figthing even for your freedom.i belive and i'm 300% sure my dear friend that i'm not a racist.Born in cuba,be mix with black and white,figth for millions of american freedom and try to understand people like you.the idea you have of what it is marxism and communist just because you read it in a book don't really account my friend and chek next time when you try to call some one that been figthing for black,white,yellow even for the iraqi people freedom a racist.god bless to all my brother and sisters that are out there figthing rigth now for mark right to make funny comments,here.god bless us.

  Posted at 8:39PM on 29th 2008 by mel

• 42. the union of concerned SCIENTIST AND CITIZENS say 1998 and 2005 were tied as the hottest. http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming/science/recordtemp2005.html it also states that 19 of the 20 hottest yeaRS HAVE OCCURED SINCE 1980. IF ANYONE HAS CONTRADICTING DATA WHAT'S UP WITH THE BIG ICE SHELF IN ANTARCTICA BREAKING OFF.

  Posted at 8:37PM on 29th 2008 by dan

• 43. There is no concensus in science. Just because most of a group that are putting for Federal grant money say that something is happening does not prove it. Science is repeatable, it can be confirmed. Even scientists can have a personnal or political agenda

  Posted at 8:33PM on 29th 2008 by Mark

• 44. How many people died at the dome? I think 6 bodies were recovered. One was a suicide and 4 were from natural causes. How many people have died in Burma or China this last month. It would be nice to keep things in perspective.

  Posted at 8:28PM on 29th 2008 by Mark

• 45. there is a lot of b.s. flying around. let's set the record straight and look to the NASA scientists who state"A majority of climatologists have concluded that human activities are responsible for most of the warming." This is a direct qoute from the nasa website.

  Posted at 8:24PM on 29th 2008 by dan