Kelly's Kitson Dress Disaster?

Reader Comments

• 31. If Kelly got the dresses and jewelry in good condition they should have been returned the same way. If the dresses were lent in that condition I would think there would be some type of paperwork stating the condition before they took them. I would think if miss Monico is in the habit of barrowing her dresses rather than buying them she would at least have them cleaned before returning and if she did cause the damage she should pay for them. If you are a fan or not I think people should see this would have been the decent thing for her to do. Obviosly there is a problem , so her stating it is all BS doe not really cut it.

  Posted at 4:33AM on 3rd 2008 by Tammy

• 32. what was she supossed to do? Not sit down?

  Posted at 6:06PM on 2nd 2008 by chelsey

• 33. HATERS LISTEN UP KEMO IS HOT AND U R NOT, so get over it. Kemo is not the first celebrity that borrows stuff.

  Posted at 3:48PM on 2nd 2008 by Kemo Fan

• 34. The dress is ugly anyways

  Posted at 9:06PM on 1st 2008 by Chandler

• 35. Did she get into a bar fight to cause all those rips and tears. I think it's a load of BS.

  Posted at 2:42PM on 1st 2008 by dana

• 36. So the "stars" borrow clothes all the time? That burns me up. No one lets me borrow clothes for my gig.

  Posted at 8:35AM on 1st 2008 by QueenVelveeta

• 37. I do wonder about some of the damage - she would need to have gotten into a cat fight for the rips, I think. The dirt is another story and if she is that messy and dirty, then perhaps she could have managed those tears. Even with the close ups, it is difficult to see the damage. Regardless, (no such word as irregardless, hon) she should not have been a week late, nor should she have been wearing another dress to another event if they had not had that in their agreement all along. Sounds like she is just another self centered diva that thinks she deserves everything free.

  Posted at 5:45AM on 1st 2008 by Ms_Tell

• 38. FAKE BOOBS KELLY MONACO IS A BUTTAFACE WHO WON A FIXED DWTS TO PROMOTE ABC SHOWS,SHES A PLAYBOY PORNSTAR PRETENDING TO A SOAPSTAR AND SHE HAS NO EMMY

  Posted at 2:52PM on 31st 2008 by ROBERT GUZA

• 39. Looks like a very poorly made dress that fell apart when worn.

  Posted at 2:28PM on 31st 2008 by Pfffft

• 40. Irregardless if she looks gorgeous or the dresses are ugly is of no consequence for me. You make a deal you stand up to it...she didn't think they were too ugly she wore them so they are very expensive dresses she borrowed them it is "her responsibility" to honor the agreement of whatever guidelines that were set. If not she makes enough money to buy her own. Then do just that.

  Posted at 1:36PM on 31st 2008 by Cyber

• 41. Celebs borrow clothing ALL the time. This was obviously poorly made clothing. I am sure Kelly has worn other borrowed clothes as well and not had issues. Beads that fall off like that should not happen on a $2500 dress. I met Kelly and she was super gratious, friendly and I am sure if her management felt as though she had done something wrong they would have taken care of it. As far DWTS being set up for her to win because of ABC shows, then why didn't Cameron Mathison win? That is a pretty ignorant statement. So what if she was in a playboy spread, she's beautiful.. How many other stars have done the same?

  Posted at 10:46AM on 31st 2008 by Jennifer

• 42. IMO the dresses look a mess! I'm sorry, but that little slit in the dress, is not a slit someone does, accidently! That slit looks like someone INTENTIONALLY cut the dress. While I agree, it was wrong for Kelly to return the dresses late.. (I do) Because, I'm sure, Kitson feel like... he lost a lot of money/potential money during that period of time! OKay, I can understand that...BUT HOWEVER, I'm skeptical about the damage he says, was done to the dresses. HOW in the world.....NO no how in the hell, can an expensive dress (that's over $2500) not hold up over night? I don't believe Kelly did that to them dresses. No way!

  Posted at 10:31AM on 31st 2008 by Shameka

• 43. If that dress can't withstand one night's wear without the cheap beads scratching and falling off, well, it's best it wasn't sold. It would have been returned. How can you sell something for 2500.00 that is so poorly made. Also, if you are going to loan clothes, expect to have them cleaned upon return. It's actually kind of gross if they haven't been.

  Posted at 8:07AM on 31st 2008 by Karen

• 44. First of all the dresses are fugly! Close up looks cheap with tacky ornamentation. How do we not know that the "damage" wasn't done by loaning it out to someone else first, since Kitson is so generous to loan out their clothes. Some of the quote damage looks like body make-up because all the DWTS fake tan. $6250 for a couple dresses? Not worth 62 cents!

  Posted at 2:05AM on 31st 2008 by mercedes

• 45. How can a dress with that much beading NOT snag, or beads be scratched???? DO NOT lend dresses that are suppose to be re-sold to anyone...famous or not!!! Take a LOSS and be THANKFUL that they mentioned your shop AGAIN!!!!!!!!! I HATE when I have bought an item that looks worn and when I have asked salesperson they act clueless??!!

  Posted at 1:48AM on 31st 2008 by mira