183. I have never understood the attraction to SJP. She seems very wrapped up in herself, which makes her rather unattractive to begin with, but she has a rather horsey appearance. I think she could improve her appearance by not parting her hair down the middle. Not sure what she can do about her personality, though.
184. who could call a baby ugly, I think she's quite cute. She is not ugly just uniquely featured. I've always thought she resembled Barbara Streisand. I wish those who post negative comments would post their baby pics and their shapes.
185. You know what's ugly? The nasty comments made here. SJP is not ugly. She is a normal average looking woman. There are VERY few pretty women. The majority are just average looking. What makes someone pretty is what comes from inside. Everyone seems to love her so she must be doing something right. SJP is just like Julie Roberts. Some pics are flattering and others are not.
187. She was kind of pretty in her old first movie Footloose but what the heck happend her nose got bigger and she aged ALOT and sadly I can't respect her becasue she is in sex in the city the whorey part only makes her uglier she should try being in a real movie or something else with class.
190. I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW HOW IN EARTH SARAH PARKER EVER MADE IT TO HOLLYWOOD????
SHE IS UGLY AND I DO MEAN UGLY!!HOW DID SHE MAKE IT?? NO TALANT AT ALL. SHE REALLY LOOKS LIKE A MAN IN DRAG!! DAM I WOULD LOOK MUCH BETTER THAN HER!!
193. sarah pucker...one of hollywoods uglyest..poor matt...sarah cover up and leave the country. I wouldn't watch anythnig with u in it....ugggggggllllllyyyyyy
194. The photo is not good. What photographer would want their picture to look like that? Did Sarah Jessica Parker approve of the photo shot? I wouldn't think so! She is cute but not a beautiful girl. She has the next door or down to earth look. I have only watched Sex in the City during the late hour reruns and I can see why so many people liked the show. I've seen a few of her movies and she is good but I think it is the part she is playing and the material that is not outstanding. Given the right part, a good Director she may be a better actress. Reading this blog is terrible. How cruel some of the messages are. Frankly, if you don't like Sarah or the shows she is in,then don't go there. She is not "ugly" but then not everyone can be "beautiful." I wonder how "ugly" some of the people are who wrote those "nasty" comments or if they speak this way about their relatives or close friends who may be cute but not beautiful. How sad!
Reader Comments
181. I LOVE HER. SHE IS BEAUTIFUL IN HER OWN WAY
Posted at 5:48PM on 7th 2009 by peggy
182. She is not ugly. Get over it. Stop being jealous.
Posted at 5:44PM on 7th 2009 by Geefee
183. I have never understood the attraction to SJP. She seems very wrapped up in herself, which makes her rather unattractive to begin with, but she has a rather horsey appearance. I think she could improve her appearance by not parting her hair down the middle. Not sure what she can do about her personality, though.
Posted at 5:42PM on 7th 2009 by JFAVA
184. who could call a baby ugly, I think she's quite cute. She is not ugly just uniquely featured. I've always thought she resembled Barbara Streisand. I wish those who post negative comments would post their baby pics and their shapes.
Posted at 5:39PM on 7th 2009 by shiloh
185. You know what's ugly? The nasty comments made here. SJP is not ugly. She is a normal average looking woman. There are VERY few pretty women. The majority are just average looking. What makes someone pretty is what comes from inside. Everyone seems to love her so she must be doing something right. SJP is just like Julie Roberts. Some pics are flattering and others are not.
Posted at 5:36PM on 7th 2009 by Holly
186. I have seen uglier. Its cruel to call people ugly too.
Posted at 5:13PM on 7th 2009 by Gina
187. She was kind of pretty in her old first movie Footloose but what the heck happend her nose got bigger and she aged ALOT and sadly I can't respect her becasue she is in sex in the city the whorey part only makes her uglier she should try being in a real movie or something else with class.
Posted at 5:11PM on 7th 2009 by Heather
188. I can see she was ugly then and ugly now LOL too bad she didn't grow out of it
Posted at 5:09PM on 7th 2009 by daisy
189. WELL THE GREAT BIG NOSE MUST HAVE COME AFTER SHE GREW UP A LITTLE
Posted at 5:03PM on 7th 2009 by ESMITH
190. I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW HOW IN EARTH SARAH PARKER EVER MADE IT TO HOLLYWOOD???? SHE IS UGLY AND I DO MEAN UGLY!!HOW DID SHE MAKE IT?? NO TALANT AT ALL. SHE REALLY LOOKS LIKE A MAN IN DRAG!! DAM I WOULD LOOK MUCH BETTER THAN HER!!
Posted at 5:03PM on 7th 2009 by ANNMARIE49
191. Looks like a big guy in drag. Even the horses won't play with her.
Posted at 4:53PM on 7th 2009 by Otis
192. Looks a little like a guy in drag in this photo!
Posted at 4:40PM on 7th 2009 by Val
193. sarah pucker...one of hollywoods uglyest..poor matt...sarah cover up and leave the country. I wouldn't watch anythnig with u in it....ugggggggllllllyyyyyy
Posted at 4:38PM on 7th 2009 by jim
194. The photo is not good. What photographer would want their picture to look like that? Did Sarah Jessica Parker approve of the photo shot? I wouldn't think so! She is cute but not a beautiful girl. She has the next door or down to earth look. I have only watched Sex in the City during the late hour reruns and I can see why so many people liked the show. I've seen a few of her movies and she is good but I think it is the part she is playing and the material that is not outstanding. Given the right part, a good Director she may be a better actress. Reading this blog is terrible. How cruel some of the messages are. Frankly, if you don't like Sarah or the shows she is in,then don't go there. She is not "ugly" but then not everyone can be "beautiful." I wonder how "ugly" some of the people are who wrote those "nasty" comments or if they speak this way about their relatives or close friends who may be cute but not beautiful. How sad!
Posted at 4:38PM on 7th 2009 by Marie
195. she look good
Posted at 4:36PM on 7th 2009 by roger